Publication Ethic

Publication Ethics of the Journal

An-Nisa’ Journal of Gender Studies is a peer-reviewed academic journal published twice a year under the management of the Institute for Research and Community Service (LP2M), Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember, Indonesia. The journal is available in both print and online formats with an open-access system. The following section outlines the ethical guidelines for all parties involved in the publication process, including authors, the editor-in-chief, editorial board members, reviewers, and the publisher. This ethical policy is formulated with reference to Elsevier’s Publishing Ethics and COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

The publication of articles in An-Nisa’ Journal of Gender Studies contributes to the development of a reliable and interconnected network of scholarly knowledge. Each published article serves as a representation of the quality of the authors’ academic work as well as their respective institutions. The peer-review process plays a crucial role in ensuring the responsible application of scientific methods. Therefore, it is essential to establish a mutual understanding of the ethical principles and practices that must be adhered to by all parties involved in the publication process, including authors, editors, reviewers, publishers, and the academic community.

As the publisher, An-Nisa’ Journal of Gender Studies is responsible for managing all stages of publication in accordance with ethical and professional standards. The Institute for Research and Community Service, Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember ensures that financial elements such as advertising, reprint services, or other forms of commercial support do not influence editorial decisions or the scientific review process.

Duties of Editors

Publication Decisions

The editors of An-Nisa' Journal of Gender Studies are responsible for determining which articles are eligible for publication in the journal. The main considerations in this process are the scientific validity of the work and its relevance to researchers and readers. In carrying out their duties, editors refer to policies established by the editorial board and take into account legal provisions related to defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. Editors are also permitted to seek input from other editors and reviewers before making a final decision.

Fairness

Editors evaluate manuscripts based on their intellectual quality and substance, without considering factors such as the author's race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic background, nationality, or political views.

Confidentiality

The editor and editorial team are required to maintain the confidentiality of submitted manuscripts and are not permitted to share related information with any party, except with the corresponding author, reviewers, prospective reviewers, editorial advisors, and publishers, as required for the editorial process.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

The contents of unpublished manuscripts may not be used for research purposes by editors without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

The peer review process assists editors in making editorial decisions, while communication during the process can support authors in refining their manuscripts.

Timeliness

Any selected reviewer who feels incompetent to evaluate the content of the manuscript or realizes that they cannot complete the review on time must notify the editor and withdraw from the review process.

Confidentiality

Manuscripts submitted for review must be treated as confidential documents and may not be shared or discussed with any party without the editor's consent.

Objectivity Standards

The review process must be conducted objectively. Personal criticism or comments directed at the author are not permitted. Reviewers must express their opinions clearly and provide relevant reasons.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Reviewers are required to point out relevant works that have not been cited by the author. Any statements, findings, or arguments that have been published previously must be accompanied by the correct references. In addition, reviewers need to inform the editor if there is significant substance or overlap between the manuscript being reviewed and other publications known to the reviewer.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Information and ideas obtained during the review process must remain confidential and may not be used for personal gain. Reviewers must also decline to review if they have a conflict of interest due to competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with the author, company, or institution associated with the manuscript.

Duties of Author

Reporting Standards

Authors of original research works should provide an accurate account of the work performed and discuss its significance objectively. Key data should be presented accurately in the article. Manuscripts should be supplemented with sufficient detail and references so that the research can be replicated. Misleading or deliberately inaccurate presentation of information is unethical and intolerable.

Originality and Plagiarism

Authors must guarantee that the submitted manuscript is their original work. If authors use the work or expressions of others, they must be properly cited or referenced.

Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication

In general, authors are prohibited from publishing the same research report in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting identical manuscripts to multiple journals at the same time is considered unethical and unacceptable.

Acknowledgments

Proper credit for the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been important in shaping the research presented.

Authorship of Articles

Authorship is only given to individuals who have contributed significantly to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the research. Those who have made substantial contributions should be listed as co-authors, while others who have been involved in specific aspects should be acknowledged as contributors. The corresponding author is responsible for ensuring that all eligible co-authors are listed in the article, that no names are included inappropriately, and that all co-authors have reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript and agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

All authors are required to declare in the manuscript any conflicts of interest, whether financial or substantive, that may influence the results or interpretation of the research. In addition, all forms of funding support must be clearly disclosed.

Fundamental Errors in Published Works

If authors become aware of any significant errors or inaccuracies in their published work, they are obligated to immediately inform the editor or publisher and cooperate in retracting or correcting the article.

Published by:

Institute for Research and Community Service,
Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember, East Java, Indonesia.