Mapping research on gender representation in English-language textbooks: A systematic review of thematic distribution and overlap https://doi.org/10.35719/annisa.v17i2.320 Authors Ankur Nandi Kalyani University West Bengal, India Tarini Hader Kalyani University West Bengal, India Tapash Das Kazi Nazrul University West Bengal, India Gender Representation, English-Language Textbooks, Thematic Distribution, Thematic Overlap, Systematic Literature Review Abstract How to Cite Metrics References Similar Articles Gender representation in English-language textbooks raises concerns about educational inclusion and equity, yet existing scholarship offers limited clarity on how different dimensions of representation are examined and integrated across studies. This study characterizes the literature, maps five research themes, and examines their distribution and co-occurrence across publications. Guided by PRISMA, this systematic review screened 358 identified records and included 45 studies published between 2007 and 2024. Study characteristics were summarized descriptively, and five themes were coded non-exclusively to assess their thematic overlap. Games and leisure activities attracted the most research attention (21 studies; 46.7%), followed by visual representation (20; 44.4%), language and terminology (16; 35.6%), occupational roles (13; 28.9%), and cultural and regional contexts (8; 17.8%). Twenty-four studies addressed one theme, and 21 addressed multiple themes, including two covering all five. Visual representation overlapped with leisure activities in 12 studies, while language overlapped with occupational roles in eight. The mapping distinguishes four content dimensions from one contextual dimension, providing an interpretive structure informed by Gender Schema Theory. Theme frequencies and overlaps describe research coverage, not the prevalence, direction, or severity of gender bias. Education authorities should pilot gender-responsive textbook review policies that assess language, images, occupations, and activities using transparent, context-sensitive criteria, with documented findings guiding possible revisions before procurement and classroom adoption. Nandi, A., Hader, T., & Das, T. (2024). Mapping research on gender representation in English-language textbooks: A systematic review of thematic distribution and overlap. An-Nisa’ Journal of Gender Studies, 17(2), 131-146. https://doi.org/10.35719/annisa.v17i2.320 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver AMA Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX Downloads Download data is not yet available. References Ahmad, M., & Shah, S. K. (2019). A critical discourse analysis of gender representations in the content of 5th grade English language textbook. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.17583/rimcis.2019.3989 Ali, R., & Hussain, L. (2019). Gender representation in primary level English and Urdu textbooks in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Applied Social Sciences, 10, 83–100. https://doi.org/10.46697/0020.0001 Amini, M., & Birjandi, P. (2012). Gender bias in the Iranian high school EFL textbooks. English Language Teaching, 5 (2), 134-147. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n2p134 Ariyanto, S. (2018). A portrait of gender bias in the prescribed Indonesian ELT textbook for junior high school students. Sexuality & Culture, 22, 1054-1076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9512-8 Barton, A., & Sakwa, L. N. (2012). The representation of gender in English textbooks in Uganda. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 20 (2), 173-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2012.669394 Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354 Blumberg, R. L. (2008). The invisible obstacle to educational equality: Gender bias in textbooks. Prospects, 38, 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-009-9086-1 Bramer, W. M., Rethlefsen, M. L., Kleijnen, J., & Franco, O. H. (2017). Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: A prospective exploratory study. Systematic Reviews, 6, Article 245. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Crawfurd, L., Saintis-Miller, C., & Todd, R. (2024). Sexist textbooks: Automated analysis of gender bias in 1,255 books from 34 countries. PLOS ONE, 19(10), Article e0310366. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310366 De la Torre-Sierra, A. M., & Guichot-Reina, V. (2022). The influence of school textbooks on the configuration of gender identity: A study on the unequal representation of women and men in the school discourse during the Spanish democracy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 117, Article 103810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103810 Fithriani, R. (2022). Gender stereotypes in educational texts: A comparative study of Indonesian and international primary English textbooks. Discourse and Interaction, 15(2), 53–76. https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2022-2-53 Foroutan, Y. (2012). Gender representation in school textbooks in Iran: The place of languages. Current Sociology, 60(6), 771–787. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392112459744 Gharbavi, A., & Mousavi, S. A. (2012). A content analysis of textbooks: Investigating gender bias as a social prominence in Iranian high school english textbooks. English Linguistics Research, 1 (1), 42-49. https://doi.org/10.5430/elr.v1n1p42 Ghorbani, L. (2009). An investigation of the manifestation of sexism in EFL/ESL textbooks. English Language Teaching, 2 (4), 121-127. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v2n4p121 Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x Guichot-Reina, V., & De la Torre-Sierra, A. (2023). The representation of gender stereotypes in Spanish mathematics textbooks for elementary education. Sexuality & Culture, 27, 1481–1503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-023-10075-1 Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378 Habib, F. A., Wija Putra, B. A., & Setyono, B. (2020). Gender stereotypes portrayed in a senior high school english textbook published by Indonesia ministry of education and culture. Jurnal Edukasi, 7 (3), 22-27. https://doi.org/10.19184/jukasi.v7i3.21602 Huang, P., & Liu, X. (2024). Challenging gender stereotypes: Representations of gender through social interactions in English learning textbooks. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11 (1), 819. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03293-x Islam, K. M. M., & Asadullah, M. N. (2018). Gender stereotypes and education: A comparative content analysis of Malaysian, Indonesian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi school textbooks. PLoS ONE, 13(1), e0190807. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.019080 James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5, Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6 Jehle, A. M. C., Groeneveld, M. G., van de Rozenberg, T. M., & Mesman, J. (2024). The hidden lessons in textbooks: Gender representation and stereotypes in European mathematics and language books. European Journal of Education, 59, Article e12716. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12716 Kostas, M. (2023). Textbooks, students and teachers talk around gender: A new materialist approach to children's agency. Teaching and Teacher Education, 125, 104052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104052 Lee, J. F. K., & Collins, P. (2009). Australian English-language textbooks: The gender issues. Gender and Education, 21(4), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250802392257 Maulida, R. (2017). English elementary school textbooks analysis: Addressing gender bias issues [Master's thesis, Ar-Raniry State Islamic University]. UIN Ar-Raniry Repository. https://repository.ar-raniry.ac.id/2225/ Mebratu, B., & Semela, T. (2022). Is gender-bias in textbooks spilled over from schools to universities? Evidence from Ethiopian university English language course textbooks. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2152616. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2152616 Mihira, L. S. N., Suwastini, N. K. A., Artini, N. N., Jayantini, I. G. A. S. R., & Budiarta, I. W. (2023). Gender inequality represented in English textbooks: A literature review. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 10(3), 192–208. https://doi.org/10.23887/jish-undiksha.v10i3.39209 Mukundan, J., & Nimehchisalem, V. (2008). Gender representation in Malaysian secondary school English language textbooks. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 4 (2), 155-172. https://doi.org/10.25170/ijelt.v4i2.189 Orfan, S. N. (2023). High school English textbooks promote gender inequality in Afghanistan. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 31(3), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.1914148 Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 Pavlenko, A. (2004). Gender and sexuality in foreign and second language education: Critical and feminist approaches. In B. Norton & K. Toohey (Eds.), Critical pedagogies and language learning (pp.53-71). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524834.004 Rong, J., Xue, G., Zhang, M., & Zhou, M. (2021). Gender bias in the curriculum: A reflection from the English textbook. In Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (Vol. 571, pp. 1–10). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210407.001 Roohani, A., & Zarei, M. (2013). Evaluating gender-bias in the Iranian pre-university English textbooks. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v3i1.1099 Shallaita, B. A., Nawawi, N., & Amin, M. (2021). Analysis of English language teaching materials on gender representation. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 8(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i2.2423 Shamsuddin, M., Keong, Y. C., & Abdul Hamid, B. (2015). Gender stereotyped images of occupations in Malaysian primary English textbooks: A social semiotic approach. Arab World English Journal, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2843936 Skliar, O. S. (2007). Gender representations and gender bias in ELT textbooks published in the Middle East: A case study of ELT textbooks published in Turkey and Iran [Master's thesis, Middle East Technical University]. METU Institutional Repository. https://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12607942/index.pdf Suchana, A. A. (2024). Discourse of patriarchy through gendered language: A study of EFL textbooks in Bangladesh. Heliyon, 10(20), e39362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39362 Tabatadze, S. (2023). Woman against a woman? Inherited discourses to reproduce power: A gender discourse analysis of school textbooks in the context of Georgia. Education Sciences, 13(8), 795. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13080795 Taylor, F. (2003). Content analysis and gender stereotypes in children's books. Educational Review, 55 (2), 135-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013191032000072206 Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14 (3), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375 Tyarakanita, A., Drajati, N. A., Rochsantiningsih, D., & Nurkamto, J. (2021). The representation of gender stereotypes in Indonesian English language textbooks. Sexuality & Culture, 25(3), 1140–1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-021-09813-0 Ullah, H., & Skelton, C. (2013). Gender representation in the public sector schools textbooks of Pakistan. Educational Studies, 39(2), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2012.702892 Ullah, H., Ali, J., & Naz, A. (2014). Gender representation in children's books: A critical review of empirical studies. World Applied Sciences Journal, 29(1), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2014.29.01.13831 Yang, C. C. R. (2016). Are males and females still portrayed stereotypically? Visual analyses of gender in two Hong Kong primary English language textbook series. Gender and Education, 28(5), 674–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2015.1103839 Zhang, L., Zhang, Y., & Cao, R. (2022). “Can we stop cleaning the house and make some food, Mum?”: A critical investigation of gender representation in China's English textbooks. Linguistics and Education, 69, Article 101058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2022.101058 Zhou, X., Sun, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2021). The role of textbooks in shaping students' thoughts and perspectives: A study on chinese school education. Asian Education and Development Studies, 10 (3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-03-2020-0043 Downloads Full Text (English) 2024-12-21 Vol. 17 No. 2 (2024): An-Nisa Journal of Gender Studies Section Articles Copyright (c) 2024 Ankur Nandi, Tarini Hader, Tapash Das This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. How to Cite Nandi, A., Hader, T., & Das, T. (2024). Mapping research on gender representation in English-language textbooks: A systematic review of thematic distribution and overlap. An-Nisa’ Journal of Gender Studies, 17(2), 131-146. https://doi.org/10.35719/annisa.v17i2.320 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver AMA Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX