Weaving inequality: The reproduction of gender-based symbolic violence among ikat weavers in Kediri https://doi.org/10.35719/annisa.v18i2.384 Authors Diah Handayani Universitas Islam Negeri Syekh Wasil Kediri, East Java, Indonesia Aniello Iannone Vice-Coordinator, Asia Desk, Geopolitica.info, Italy Symbolic Violence, Gender Inequality, Habitus, Ikat Weaving Abstract How to Cite Metrics References Similar Articles The normalization of inequalities in working-time arrangements, pay, and training access raises concerns about the reproduction of gender-based symbolic violence among women workers in Kediri’s ikat weaving industry. This study aims to examine the reproduction of symbolic violence and power relations through women’s working-time arrangements, remuneration within gendered divisions of labor, and seniority and access to training. Using a critical qualitative approach and an intrinsic single-case study design, the study involved 12 participants from three weaving enterprises in Bandar Kidul, Kediri. Data were collected through interviews and observations, analyzed thematically, and triangulated to strengthen credibility. Three patterns emerged. First, the normalization of exploitative working hours involved unclear working hours, fear of job loss, the absence of overtime pay or bonuses, and habituation to production discipline. Second, the naturalization of wage inequality involved gendered divisions of labor, acceptance of compensation arrangements, and undervaluation of women’s weaving skills. Third, the reproduction of seniority involved respect for experience, limited access to design training for junior workers, and acceptance of corrections based on senior workers’ expertise. These patterns suggest that economic pressures and social legitimation jointly sustain inequality. Nevertheless, compliance does not necessarily imply full consent, and respect for senior expertise should be distinguished from the justification of unequal access. The study extends the application of Bourdieu’s theory to traditional crafts and supports working-time recordkeeping, pay transparency, recognition of women’s skills, safe grievance mechanisms, and equitable access to training. . Handayani, D., & Iannone, A. (2025). Weaving inequality: The reproduction of gender-based symbolic violence among ikat weavers in Kediri. An-Nisa’ Journal of Gender Studies, 18(2), 153-168. https://doi.org/10.35719/annisa.v18i2.384 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver AMA Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX Downloads Download data is not yet available. References Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243206289499 Ahmed, S. K. (2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2, 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100051 Balkin, E. J., Kollerup, M. G., Kymre, I. G. G., Martinsen, B., & Grønkjær, M. (2023). Ethics and the impossibility of the consent form: Ethnography in a Danish nursing home. Journal of Aging Studies, 64, 101110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2023.101110 Billett, S. (2004). Workplace participatory practices: Conceptualising workplaces as learning environments. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(6), 312–324. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620410550295 Bourdieu, P. (1990). 3 Structures, Habitus, Practices. In The Logic of Practice (pp. 52-65). Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503621749-005 Bourdieu, P., & Thompson, J. B. (1991). Language and symbolic power (G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans.). Harvard University Press. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Brogan, G. S., & Dooley, K. E. (2024). Weaving together social capital to empower women artisan entrepreneurs. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 16(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-03-2023-0076 Buchori, I., Zaki, A., Pangi, P., Sejati, A. W., & Pramitasari, A. (2024). Garment industry-led urbanization and women workers: Factory- and home-based work in Indonesia. International Review of Sociology, 34(2), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2024.2366348 Carswell, G. (2016). Struggles over work take place at home: Women’s decisions, choices and constraints in the Tiruppur textile industry, India. Geoforum, 77, 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.10.009 Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545–547. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547 Dedeoğlu, S. (2010). Visible hands–invisible women: Garment production in Turkey. Feminist Economics, 16(4), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2010.530606 Denzin, N. K. (2017). Critical qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416681864 Dias, R. M., Ogle, J. P., & Diddi, S. (2020). Constructing cultural identity through weaving among Ri-Bhoi women weavers: A symbolic interactionist approach. International Textile and Apparel Association Annual Conference Proceedings, 77(1). https://doi.org/10.31274/itaa.11989 Friedemann, M. L., Mayorga, C., & Jimenez, L. D. (2011). Data collectors' field journals as tools for research. Journal of research in nursing: JRN, 16(5), 10.1177/1744987110387319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987110387319 Fuller, A., & Unwin, L. (2003). Learning as apprentices in the contemporary UK workplace: Creating and managing expansive and restrictive participation. Journal of Education and Work, 16(4), 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/1363908032000093012 Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903. Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360 Han, Y., Fan, L. L., & Xue, Y. (2024). A sustainable balance between innovation and risk: How the “right to science” affects China’s medical biotechnology regulatory policy. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 24, 306–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2024.04.027 Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women's empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00125 Kantor, P. (2002). A sectoral approach to the study of gender constraints on economic opportunities in the informal sector in India. Gender & Society, 16(3), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243202016003002 Kelan, E. K. (2009). Gender fatigue: The ideological dilemma of gender neutrality and discrimination in organizations. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 26(3), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.106 Krisnadi, T. (2024). The Role of Sumba Women Weavers in Family Economic Empowerment: A Case Study of Ikat Weaving Preservation in Sumba, NTT. Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 8(1), 225-243. https://doi.org/10.31538/iijse.v8i1.5916 Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject (REV-Revised). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvct00cf Maynard, A. E., Greenfield, P. M., Childs, C. P., & Weinstock, M. (2024). Social change, cultural evolution, weaving apprenticeship, and development: Informal education across three generations and 42 years in a Maya community. Applied Developmental Science, 28(1), 82–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2022.2151445 McNay, L. (1999). Gender, habitus and the field: Pierre Bourdieu and the limits of reflexivity. Theory, Culture & Society, 16(1), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327699016001007 Morgenroth, T., & Ryan, M. K. (2018). Gender trouble in social psychology: How can Butler’s work inform experimental social psychologists’ conceptualization of gender? Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1320. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01320 Mulhall, A. (2003). In the field: Notes on observation in qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(3), 306–313. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02514.x Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42, 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y Rai, S. M., Brown, B. D., & Ruwanpura, K. N. (2019). SDG 8: Decent work and economic growth—A gendered analysis. World Development, 113, 368–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.09.006 Samuel, C. (2013). Symbolic Violence and Collective Identity: Pierre Bourdieu and the Ethics of Resistance. Social Movement Studies, 12(4), 397–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2013.823345 Saunders, B., Kitzinger, J., & Kitzinger, C. (2015). Anonymising interview data: Challenges and compromise in practice. Qualitative Research, 15(5), 616–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794114550439 Schlunegger, M. C., Zumstein-Shaha, M., & Palm, R. (2024). Methodologic and data-analysis triangulation in case studies: A scoping review. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 46(8), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459241263011 Semuel, H., Mangoting, Y., & Hatane, S. E. (2022). The Interpretation of Quality in the Sustainability of Indonesian Traditional Weaving. Sustainability, 14(18), 11344. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811344 Son Hing, L. S., Sakr, N., Sorenson, J. B., Stamarski, C. S., Caniera, K., & Colaco, C. (2023). Gender inequities in the workplace: A holistic review of organizational processes and practices. Human Resource Management Review, 33(3), 100968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2023.100968 Song, X., Yang, Y., Yang, R., et al. (2024). How are Chinese traditional handicraft skills inherited from master to apprentice? International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 34, 1543–1559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-023-09867-1 Spinuzzi, C. (2023). What is a workplace? Principles for bounding case studies of genres, processes, objects, and organizations. Written Communication, 40(4), 1027–1069. https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883231185875 Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications. Tartanoğlu, Ş. (2018). The voluntary precariat in the value chain: The hidden patterns of home-based garment production in Turkey. Competition & Change, 22(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024529417745475 Thapar-Bjorkert, S., Samelius, L., & Sanghera, G. S. (2016). Exploring symbolic violence in the everyday: Misrecognition, condescension, consent and complicity. Feminist Review, 112(1), 144–162. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2015.53 Tomaszewski, L. E., Zarestky, J., & Gonzalez, E. (2020). Planning qualitative research: Design and decision making for new researchers. International journal of qualitative methods, 19, https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920967174 Tong, R., & Botts, T. F. (2018). Feminist thought: A more comprehensive introduction (5th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429495243 van den Brink, M., & Benschop, Y. (2012). Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs. Organization, 19(4), 507–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508411414293 Vogeley, J., & Oetojo, J. O. (2025). “She Understands the Weaving Dance:” Textiles, Values, and Profitability. Business & Society, 64(8), 1486-1519. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503251338740 Widiastuti, T., Al-shami, S. A., Mawardi, I., Zulaikha, S., Haron, R., Kasri, R. A., Al Mustofa, M. U., & Dewi, E. P. (2024). Capturing the barriers and strategic solutions for women empowerment: Delphi analytical network process. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(3), 100345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100345 Zhu, J., Spence, C., & Ezzamel, M. (2021). Thinking like the state: Doxa and symbolic power in the accounting field in China. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 93, 101235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2021.101235 Downloads Full Text (English) 2025-12-29 Vol. 18 No. 2 (2025): An-Nisa' Journal of Gender Studies Section Articles Copyright (c) 2025 Diah Handayani, Aniello Iannone This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. How to Cite Handayani, D., & Iannone, A. (2025). Weaving inequality: The reproduction of gender-based symbolic violence among ikat weavers in Kediri. An-Nisa’ Journal of Gender Studies, 18(2), 153-168. https://doi.org/10.35719/annisa.v18i2.384 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver AMA Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX